---

Four years have passed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The war has brought murder on an industrial scale, systematic attacks on civilian infrastructure, forced displacement of millions, abduction of children, and environmental devastation from land mines and scorched earth tactics. It has fueled a refugee crisis, eroded global stability, and imposed crushing economic burdens far beyond the battlefield. Yet for all this suffering, the central question remains, what has anyone gained? The answer is painfully clear. Almost nothing of lasting value, only burdens that weigh on every participant and bystander alike.

The human toll stands as the war’s most harrowing consequence. Estimates from the Center for Strategic and International Studies in January 2026 place Russian military casualties at approximately 1.2 million, including up to 325,000 deaths, the highest toll for any major power in any conflict since World War II. Ukrainian military casualties range from 500,000 to 600,000, with 100,000 to 140,000 fatalities according to the same analysis, though President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reported 55,000 Ukrainian troop deaths earlier in the year. Independent Russian outlets like BBC Russian Service and Mediazona have verified over 186,000 Russian soldier deaths by name, while civilian deaths in Ukraine exceed 15,000, with more than 41,000 injured. These figures spark fierce controversy. Russian sources routinely claim far higher Ukrainian losses, sometimes doubling or tripling Western estimates, while Kyiv and its allies emphasize Russian overstretch. Beyond the numbers, the war has erased a generation of young men on both sides, hollowed out families, and left lasting trauma that will echo for decades.

Economic fallout followed swiftly and spread globally. In the war’s opening months, oil prices surged past 130 dollars per barrel, wheat futures hit 14-year highs, and global food prices spiked dramatically. Ukraine’s grain exports, once a lifeline for dozens of nations, plummeted. By 2025, Ukrainian corn, barley, wheat, and related exports stood 35 percent below 2020 levels. Russia, by contrast, temporarily boosted its own wheat shipments to a record 55 million metric tons in 2023-2024 by seizing Ukrainian infrastructure and appropriating harvests, but its exports have since declined amid weather woes and labor shortages. Global cereal prices remain elevated compared with pre-2022 baselines even as they have eased from their 2022 peak. Fertilizer costs, driven by disruptions in Russian and Ukrainian supplies, have compounded the pain for farmers worldwide. In developing economies, these shocks translated into immediate inflation on staples. Oil and energy volatility added further pressure, delaying recovery from earlier pandemic disruptions. 

On the ground, Russia has secured incremental territorial gains at staggering cost. By early 2026, Moscow controls roughly 20 percent of Ukraine, including Crimea and parts of Donbas seized before 2022 plus roughly 75,000 square kilometers captured since the full-scale invasion began. That equates to about 12 percent of Ukrainian territory taken outright since February 2022. Gains in 2025 totaled around 4,800 square kilometers, or 0.8 percent of the country, concentrated in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts through grinding offensives that averaged mere tens of meters per day in key sectors like Pokrovsk. Ukraine has lost strategically vital logistics hubs and farmland but has mounted effective counterattacks in southern areas such as Hulyaipole and Oleksandrivka, liberating pockets of territory and disrupting Russian momentum. Neither side has achieved decisive breakthroughs. 

World politics have shifted profoundly under these pressures, specially since Donald Trump assumed the US presidency. From the conflict’s outset, NATO’s eastward expansion and security assurances to Ukraine formed part of the backdrop that Moscow cited as justification for invasion. Trump’s administration marked a sharp pivot. His February 28, 2025, Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy turned contentious, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance openly criticizing the Ukrainian leader and pressing for an immediate ceasefire. Trump made clear that Ukraine would not join NATO under his watch and conditioned further aid on rapid negotiations. US support, once robust, became more transactional and at times paused, straining ties with European allies who viewed the approach as undermining collective security. Relations between Washington and Brussels cooled noticeably, while Ukraine found itself in a precarious position, squeezed between reduced American backing and the need to sustain its defense.

Russia itself has paid dearly in resources and opportunity. While the United States pursued assertive policies across South America and the Middle East, Moscow’s attention and treasure remained locked in Ukraine. Sanctions have cost the Russian economy tens of billions annually in foregone growth and circumvention expenses estimated at 130 billion dollars over four years. Energy revenues fell, manufacturing slowed, and labor shortages worsened as the war economy absorbed workers and capital. GDP growth decelerated to around 0.6 to 0.9 percent in 2025, far below wartime peaks fueled by military spending. The defense budget now consumes roughly 8 percent of GDP, crowding out civilian investment and long-term development. Russia has gained no meaningful strategic depth or security; instead it confronts isolation, technological lag, and mounting internal strain without decisive victory.

The war’s global ripple effects have hit vulnerable nations especially hard. In Bangladesh, where food and energy imports form the backbone of daily life, the conflict drove up prices of wheat, edible oils, and fuel. Early spikes in 2022 exacerbated inflation and strained foreign reserves. Even as global markets partially recovered, lingering volatility in commodities kept household costs elevated. Similar pressures have afflicted other import-dependent economies across Asia and Africa, turning a regional conflict into a worldwide tax on the poor.

Ultimately, no side has secured a clear victory worth the price. Russia holds patches of Ukrainian soil but at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and a crippled economy. Ukraine has preserved its independence and exposed Russian military weaknesses yet endures devastation and uncertain future support. Europe faces energy insecurity and alliance tensions. The United States has seen its strategic bandwidth divided. Global food security remains fragile. The conflict has become a mutual burden, draining blood and treasure without delivering strategic gains.

This war demonstrates the futility of territorial conquest in the modern era. It has reshaped alliances, accelerated deglobalization in key sectors, and reminded the world that aggression exacts costs far beyond any battlefield map. A negotiated settlement respecting Ukraine’s sovereignty and addressing legitimate security concerns on all sides remains the only rational path forward. Prolonged fighting serves no one. The anniversary should prompt not celebration of resilience alone but urgent recognition that peace, however imperfect, outweighs the alternative of endless attrition. Four years in, the ledger shows only losses. It is time to close the book on this chapter of unnecessary suffering.

•    Roman Uddin is a Senior Research Associate and Youth Outreach Program Coordinator at Centre for Governance Studies (CGS)

Disclaimer: Views in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect CGS policy